Coercive Control Field Check / RES / RES-3
RES-3
Delayed, Aborted, or Cyclical Exit
Definition
Planning to leave, leaving, returning, or aborting an exit because the remaining options still include violence, poverty, loss of children, immigration harm, criminal exposure, or institutional disbelief.
How it operates
Packing and unpacking. Stays at a shelter followed by return. Cancelled protective-order petitions. Statements that leaving would cost the children or status. Post-separation return after stalking, litigation, or threats.
Function
Leave, return, or abandon an exit because violence, poverty, loss of children, immigration harm, criminal exposure, or institutional disbelief still close the remaining options.
Harm
Physical departure does not end the trap. Returns, aborted exits, and cancelled petitions consume the window in which leaving might have become durable, and later the result is used as proof the abuse was not serious.
Why this is coercive control
A freely revised relationship decision made without threat, resource monopoly, or institutional retaliation is not this conduct. Cyclical exit is movement inside remaining constraints.
Constructed example
“I went to my sister's for three days. He said if I did not come back he would tell immigration I worked off the books and he would file for sole custody.”
Fictitious. Written to illustrate the behavior. Not a case.
Tolmie et al. 2018; Crossman & Hardesty 2018; Johnson 2008; Ptacek 2023.
© 2026 Carisa Carlton.
Carlton, C. (2026). Coercive Control Field Check: RES-3. Coercive Control Observatory. Last reviewed August 31, 2026.